告别“基金盲盒”，防范“风格漂移”，重磅新规剑指公募基金顽疾

Core Viewpoint - The new regulations for public fund performance benchmarks aim to address industry issues such as "benchmark ambiguity," "style drift," and "fund blind boxes," establishing a more standardized and transparent framework for fund evaluation and performance comparison [1] Group 1: Return to Benchmark Fundamentals - The new regulations break traditional fund classifications by setting targeted requirements for different underlying asset categories, enhancing the accuracy of performance benchmarks for mixed funds [2] - The public fund industry is shifting focus from scale expansion to quality improvement, with increasing investor demand for clear risk-return characteristics [2] Group 2: Improving Disclosure Efficiency - The final version of the regulations introduces three main changes to the disclosure requirements for performance benchmarks in periodic reports, including relaxed requirements for certain fund types and a focus on core investor concerns [3] - These adjustments aim to enhance operational efficiency in the industry and ensure that disclosures are more aligned with investor needs [3] Group 3: Enhancing Fund Classification Evaluation Precision - The new regulations provide detailed suggestions and key indicators for fund evaluation institutions, allowing fund managers and sales organizations to adopt these standardized classification results [4] - This standardization helps investors better identify the risk-return characteristics of funds and reduces communication costs for fund companies [4] Group 4: Regulating Sales Display Behavior - The new regulations adjust sales display requirements by including performance displays from evaluation institutions and limiting fund types to stock funds, mixed funds, and FOFs [6] - The regulations are seen as a significant milestone for the public fund industry, promoting high-quality development and better serving wealth management and economic growth [6]