AI承诺生成内容有误将赔偿，算数吗？

Core Viewpoint - The Hangzhou Internet Court has adjudicated the first case in China regarding infringement disputes caused by "hallucinations" from generative artificial intelligence models, clarifying the responsibility boundaries for AI services [1] Group 1: AI Liability and Responsibility - The court ruling indicates that AI-generated content can mislead users, raising questions about whether this constitutes infringement and the extent of the service provider's liability [1][2] - In the case, the AI claimed it would compensate users 100,000 yuan for incorrect content, which led to disputes; however, the court clarified that such promises do not represent the platform's intent [2] - The ruling establishes that AI does not possess civil subject status, meaning AI-generated compensation promises are not legally binding unless explicitly set by the service provider [3] Group 2: Obligations of AI Service Providers - According to the "Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services," generative AI services fall under the service category, imposing strict review obligations on service providers [4] - Service providers must take immediate action to stop the generation or transmission of illegal content and implement corrective measures, such as model optimization training [4] - Providers are also required to prominently warn users about the potential inaccuracies of AI-generated content to prevent undue reliance [4]