揪出计量作弊幕后黑手

Group 1 - The article highlights the prevalence of software cheating in measuring instruments like fuel dispensers and electronic scales, which harms consumer rights and disrupts fair market competition [1] - A case in Inner Mongolia revealed that a fuel dispenser showed 102 liters instead of the actual 100 liters, exceeding the allowable error margin of ±0.30%, and the evidence collection was hindered when the station manager manipulated the computer [1] - Cheating methods have evolved, with some gas stations using systems that set "A" and "B" values to manipulate fuel delivery and tax reporting remotely [1] Group 2 - The Inner Mongolia Market Supervision Administration and the Quality Inspection Institute formed a technical team to study fuel dispenser cheating, analyzing software at the code level and uncovering the impact of parameters on fuel volume and tax amounts [2] - The team has developed an anti-cheating regulatory system and a database of cheating characteristics, successfully cracking 21 types of cheating software and 129 types of computer motherboards used nationwide [2] - Challenges in anti-cheating measures include the difficulty in identifying and collecting evidence due to the rapid nature of cheating and the proprietary nature of software used by manufacturers [2] Group 3 - Recent regulatory innovations include the approval of technical specifications for measuring instrument software evaluation and the establishment of a national measurement software evaluation station in Inner Mongolia [3] - A smart measurement regulatory platform for electronic scales was launched, which uses anti-counterfeiting technology to monitor data integrity and trigger alerts for unauthorized changes [3] - Future measurement software evaluation will require a comprehensive approach involving metrology, information security, data science, and legal regulations to create a digital measurement ecosystem [3]