物业服务不好，单个业主起诉“炒掉”物业？法院：不可以

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around a homeowner, Wang, who is dissatisfied with the property services and seeks to terminate the service contract with the property company due to perceived inadequate service quality [1] - The court ruled that the property service contract is binding for all homeowners and that individual homeowners do not have the unilateral right to terminate the contract; such a decision must be made collectively by the homeowners [1][2] - The court dismissed Wang's request for contract termination and refund of previously paid property fees, emphasizing that the right to terminate belongs to all homeowners collectively [1] Group 2 - According to the Civil Code, homeowners can exercise the right to terminate the property service contract if more than two-thirds of the homeowners by both area and number participate in the vote and agree to the termination [2] - The property service contract is characterized by its ongoing and dynamic nature, meaning it is binding on all homeowners for public interest considerations [2] - Homeowners have various avenues for redress if they encounter service issues, including communication with the property company, reporting to the homeowners' committee, or seeking assistance from local community or administrative authorities [2]