Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-02-04 10:01Group 1 - In January 2026, a total of 17 companies were reviewed for A-share IPOs, with 15 approved, resulting in an approval rate of 88.24% [1][6][28] - Two companies, Ningbo Huikang Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Xingsheng Technology Co., Ltd., were deferred for review [1][6][28] - Four companies terminated their A-share IPO processes in January, continuing the trend of single-digit terminations per month [11][33] Group 2 - The total amount raised from the 9 companies that went public in January 2026 was 9.053 billion yuan, a significant decrease compared to the previous month [1][39][44] - Among these, Zhenstone Co., Ltd. raised the highest amount at 2.919 billion yuan, while Guoliang New Materials raised the least at 194 million yuan [1][39][44] - The leading underwriter was China International Capital Corporation, which handled 2 IPOs with a total underwriting amount of 4.474 billion yuan [1][22][44] Group 3 - Xingsheng Technology was the first company in 2026 to fail to pass the IPO review, with issues raised regarding the authenticity of its sales revenue [6][28][30] - The company has a significant portion of its revenue (over 50%) coming from overseas markets, making compliance and verification of cross-border fund flows critical [7][29][30] - The underwriter, Guoxin Securities, faced scrutiny over its diligence in the review process, particularly regarding third-party payments [30][31] Group 4 - Huikang Technology was also deferred for review, with questions raised about its competitive position in the ice-making industry and the sustainability of its future performance [8][30][31] - The company must clarify the relationships with its main suppliers and ensure the accuracy of its disclosures [9][31] - Huikang Technology's main suppliers were established shortly before they began collaborating with the company, raising potential concerns about their relationships [10][31] Group 5 - In January, four companies withdrew their IPO applications, with two of them sponsored by Huatai United Securities, indicating a high withdrawal rate for this underwriter [11][14][38] - The companies that withdrew included Guangxi Baifei Dairy Co., Ltd., Nanjing Qinheng Microelectronics Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Yadian Technology Co., Ltd., and Zhuhai Saiwei Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. [11][33] - Zhuhai Saiwei had previously faced rejection in its first IPO attempt and withdrew its application after being approved in a second attempt [13][36] Group 6 - The issuance and underwriting situation showed that the average underwriting fee rate for the companies was relatively high, with Hengyun Chang's fee rate at 7.50%, which is above the industry average [19][42] - Hengyun Chang was the only company with an issuance price-to-earnings ratio exceeding the industry average, raising 1.561 billion yuan [19][42] - The underwriting fees for other companies were significantly lower, indicating a disparity in costs among different IPOs [19][42]