“数字哨兵”破解税费漏缴困局

Core Insights - The article discusses the development and implementation of a model by the Chongqing First Procuratorate to supervise the collection of soil and water conservation fees, which has successfully recovered over 50 million yuan since its launch in June 2024 [1][7]. Group 1: Background and Issues - The soil and water conservation fee is a charge levied on entities causing damage to soil conservation functions in specific areas, intended for soil erosion prevention and ecosystem restoration [2]. - Since 2021, the responsibility for collecting this fee has shifted from the water resources department to the tax department, leading to gaps in enforcement and awareness among construction project operators [2][3]. - Investigations revealed that over 70 construction projects in two districts of Chongqing had not paid the required fees, indicating a potential widespread issue across other districts [3]. Group 2: Model Development and Implementation - The Chongqing First Procuratorate faced challenges in traditional methods of data collection and verification, which were inefficient and time-consuming [4][6]. - To address these challenges, a specialized team was formed to develop a digital model that integrates data from various departments, allowing for efficient identification of projects that had not paid the fees [6]. - The model was able to quickly identify over 200 cases of payment anomalies, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing oversight [6]. Group 3: Results and Impact - By the end of 2025, the model had facilitated the recovery of over 50 million yuan in soil and water conservation fees and established a comprehensive management mechanism for construction projects [7]. - The model has been adopted by nearly 300 procuratorates nationwide, leading to over 300 cases being processed and recognized as one of the most widely used digital tools in the protection of state assets [8]. - The initiative has fostered collaboration among various departments and has been instrumental in transitioning from reactive to proactive oversight in public asset protection [8][9].