“国共交流为两岸寒冬带来暖流”，岛内各界热议国共两党智库论坛释放正向信号

Core Viewpoint - The resumption of institutional exchanges between the Kuomintang (KMT) and the Communist Party of China (CPC) marks a significant step towards enhancing cross-strait relations, emphasizing the importance of the "1992 Consensus" and opposition to "Taiwan independence" as the political foundation for dialogue and cooperation [1][2][3]. Group 1: Political Foundations - The "1992 Consensus" and opposition to "Taiwan independence" are highlighted as the essential political basis for continued exchanges between the KMT and CPC, which are deemed crucial for the peaceful development of cross-strait relations [1][2]. - Wang Huning, a senior CPC official, emphasized the need to strengthen communication with various Taiwanese parties and groups to promote peace and development across the strait [1]. Group 2: Economic Cooperation - The forum discussed various topics, including tourism, industrial cooperation, and sustainable development, aiming to normalize personnel exchanges between the two sides [4][5]. - The KMT's vice chairman, Hsiao Bi-khim, reiterated the importance of economic collaboration, referencing historical statements about "earning the world's money" through cross-strait cooperation [5]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Identity - KMT Chair Zheng Li-wen expressed the need for reconciliation and communication to reduce misjudgments and avoid conflicts, emphasizing that identity recognition among the Taiwanese public is rooted in cultural and historical contexts [3]. - Zheng criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for its long-standing push for "de-Sinicization," which she believes has contributed to a decline in the number of Taiwanese identifying as Chinese [3]. Group 4: Responses and Reactions - The DPP's response to the forum's outcomes was dismissive, claiming that the KMT's proposals do not align with the needs of the Taiwanese people, while the KMT argued that improved cross-strait communication is essential for peace [6]. - The forum's outcomes were viewed positively by various analysts, suggesting that it could lead to practical policy implementations and a revival of non-sensitive exchanges between the two sides [4][5].