匹克、红双喜等24款样品未标注生产日期

Core Viewpoint - The Chongqing Consumer Rights Protection Committee conducted a comparative test on 30 badminton products, revealing that only five brands met national standards, while 24 brands failed to label production dates, raising concerns about product quality and consumer rights [1][3]. Group 1: Test Results - Five brands, including DECATHLON, VICTOR, WECAN, YONEX, and ASICS, received a five-star rating for meeting all three testing criteria: stability, durability, and labeling [1]. - Three brands, including Kairuite, PIK, and Difeite, failed to meet the stability standard, which assesses the flight trajectory and landing accuracy of the shuttlecock [2]. - Two brands, Kairuite and Difeite, did not meet the ball head hardness standard, which affects the feel and impact during play [2]. - Difeite also failed to meet the standard for the number of pressure cycles the shuttlecock can withstand without deforming [2]. Group 2: Labeling Issues - A total of 24 brands, including Difeite and Shengjie, did not label production dates, which is a requirement under the national standard [3][4]. - The lack of labeling makes it difficult for consumers to assess product suitability and trace quality issues back to the manufacturer [3]. Group 3: Consumer Guidance - The Chongqing Consumer Rights Protection Committee has held meetings with manufacturers of non-compliant products to address issues and improve quality control [5]. - Consumers are advised to purchase badminton products from reputable stores and check for clear labeling of manufacturer information and compliance certificates [5]. - Recommendations include selecting appropriate shuttlecocks based on usage, with nylon shuttlecocks for casual play and feather shuttlecocks for professional training [5].