壹快评丨发展农村集体经济决不能弄虚作假

Core Viewpoint - The fundamental standard for measuring the true development of rural collective economy lies in whether members genuinely benefit, see real income growth, and experience reduced burdens [1][4]. Group 1: Development of Rural Collective Economy - The development of rural collective economy is a crucial measure for empowering comprehensive rural revitalization and promoting common prosperity for farmers [1]. - There are issues of falsifying data and engaging in superficial projects in some areas, undermining the actual development of rural collective economy [1][2]. - The central government emphasizes the need for realistic and sustainable development of rural collective economy, controlling operational risks and debts [1]. Group 2: Issues of Formalism and Data Falsification - Formalism has proliferated in some regions, leading to blind adherence to high targets without regard for actual conditions, resulting in data falsification [1][2]. - Common forms of income falsification include "over-posting" and "inflating" figures, such as misclassifying government funds as operational income or fabricating economic contracts [1][2]. Group 3: Correcting Performance Views - There is a need to establish a correct view of performance, moving away from formalism and performance engineering driven by unrealistic upper-level targets [3]. - A correct performance view should be based on local realities, with practical and achievable task indicators developed through thorough research and scientific decision-making [3]. Group 4: Resource Utilization and Policy Implementation - There are still many untapped resources in rural areas, and the "No. 1 Document" calls for orderly market entry of collective operational construction land to support collective economy and rural industries [4]. - Achieving assetization of rural resources can provide foundational support for the development of collective economy, thereby reducing instances of data falsification [4].