为啥这起赠与“第三者”财产案被写入检察院工作报告丨小铭切瓜

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights a legal dispute regarding the validity of property gifts made by one spouse to a third party during marriage, emphasizing that such actions violate public order and morals, leading to a legal precedent for full restitution of the gifted amount [1][2]. Group 1 - The case involves a full-time mother, Ms. Feng, who discovered her husband, Mr. He, transferred over 370,000 yuan to a third party, Ms. Li, including symbolic red envelopes [1]. - Initially, the court ruled that only half of the transferred amount should be returned, as it was deemed part of the couple's joint property [1]. - The Sichuan Provincial People's Procuratorate later filed a protest, arguing that the gift violated marital property rights and public morals, leading to a court ruling for full restitution [2]. Group 2 - The case raises a common legal question about whether gifts made to a third party during marriage should be returned and to what extent [2]. - The Supreme People's Court is set to issue judicial interpretations in 2025, reinforcing that gifts made to third parties due to extramarital affairs are invalid and should be returned in full [2]. - The legal direction indicated by the procuratorate's protest and the Supreme Court's upcoming interpretations suggests a strong stance against the transfer of marital property to maintain extramarital relationships [2].