炒作新核导条约，鲁比奥又想拉中国下水

Core Viewpoint - The expiration of the New START treaty has prompted the U.S. to call for trilateral arms control talks involving China and Russia, with U.S. officials accusing China of expanding its nuclear arsenal and asserting that any future arms control agreements must include China [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Position on Arms Control - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio claims that the traditional bilateral arms control framework between the U.S. and Russia is outdated due to China's rapid and opaque nuclear expansion [2]. - Rubio emphasizes that future arms control must encompass both China and Russia, as articulated by former President Trump, indicating that other nations also bear responsibility for ensuring strategic stability [2][4]. - The U.S. plans to negotiate from a position of strength, asserting that Russia and China should not expect the U.S. to remain passive while they expand their nuclear capabilities [4]. Group 2: China's Response - China's disarmament ambassador, Shen Jian, rebuts U.S. claims, stating that the U.S. comments are irresponsible and that China will not participate in nuclear disarmament talks at this stage [1]. - A spokesperson from the Chinese embassy in the U.S. argues that the U.S. demand for China to join the nuclear disarmament process is unreasonable and unrealistic, asserting that China maintains its nuclear arsenal at the minimum level necessary for national security [4]. Group 3: New START Treaty Context - The New START treaty, signed in 2010 and extended in 2021, officially expired on February 5, 2026, raising concerns about a potential nuclear arms race between the U.S. and Russia [5]. - Despite the treaty's expiration, reports indicate that the U.S. and Russia have agreed to continue high-level military contacts and discuss potential alternatives to the New START treaty [5]. - The U.S. European Command has stated that maintaining military dialogue is crucial for global stability and peace, emphasizing the importance of strength and transparency in reducing conflict [5].