律师：中国加密资产新规暗藏哪些行业隐秘细节？

Core Viewpoint - The recent regulatory documents regarding cryptocurrency in China indicate a tightening of the market, particularly affecting the survival of crypto assets and Web3-related businesses, while also introducing a framework for Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization, albeit with strict conditions [2][3][4]. Regulatory Framework - The documents define the attributes of RWA tokenization, marking a significant regulatory stance on the matter, which has been a topic of extensive discussion in the context of crypto asset regulation in China [3][4]. - The regulatory focus is primarily on preventing illegal financial activities associated with RWA, particularly concerning domestic assets and their tokenization [7][16]. Market Implications - The global landscape for RWA includes various types, with the U.S. market leading in traditional financial asset tokenization, while Hong Kong serves as a platform for qualified investors to access these assets [5][6]. - The regulatory documents emphasize the need for collaboration among various government departments to ensure a unified approach to crypto asset regulation, addressing inconsistencies in legal interpretations across regions [8]. Risk Management - The documents highlight the importance of preventing capital outflow through crypto assets, particularly via stablecoins, and outline measures to track and manage these flows [9]. - There is a clear warning against engaging in activities related to RWA in mainland China without proper regulatory approval, as this could lead to significant legal risks [10][16]. Industry Practices - The documents explicitly prohibit the use of virtual currencies as collateral or in insurance products, indicating a comprehensive approach to regulating crypto-related financial products [10][12]. - The regulatory stance against crypto mining remains firm, with a reiteration of the ban on mining activities and the sale of mining equipment within mainland China [14][15]. Future Directions - The framework allows for the possibility of RWA token issuance outside of China, provided that domestic entities comply with regulatory requirements and obtain necessary approvals [16][17]. - The documents suggest that only large, financially robust companies or established firms may be able to navigate the regulatory landscape to engage in RWA activities, indicating a high barrier to entry for smaller players [18][19].