乱港首恶终遭严惩 公正判刑彰显正义——香港各界坚决支持对黎智英依法重判

Core Viewpoint - The sentencing of Jimmy Lai, a prominent figure in the anti-China movement in Hong Kong, to 20 years in prison for colluding with foreign forces and inciting publications is seen as a significant step in upholding national security and the rule of law in Hong Kong [1][2][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Sentencing - The court's sentencing rationale was based on a thorough examination of evidence, including 2,220 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of documents presented during 156 days of public hearings [2]. - The court's decision reflects a mature judicial system that operates based on evidence and law, with a clear message that violating national security is unacceptable [2][6]. - The severity of Lai's crimes, including soliciting foreign intervention and inciting public unrest, warranted a strict penalty to maintain the rule of law and public order in Hong Kong [4][6]. Group 2: Public and Political Reactions - Various sectors in Hong Kong, including legal and community organizations, expressed strong support for the ruling, viewing it as a victory for justice and a necessary measure to combat anti-China forces [3][4][5]. - The public sentiment is largely in favor of the ruling, with citizens expressing relief and approval of the sentence as a means to restore order and uphold the law [4][5]. - Political groups emphasized that the ruling aligns with the mainstream public opinion advocating for the enforcement of laws against those undermining national security [6].