AI视频大量传播，周星驰经纪人质疑：平台不管吗？

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-generated content, particularly involving famous personalities, raises significant copyright and ethical concerns, prompting calls for regulation and respect for creators' rights [2][10][12]. Group 1: AI Content Generation and Copyright Issues - A short video platform has seen a surge in AI-generated clips featuring classic films by Stephen Chow, leading to questions about potential copyright infringement as creators profit from this content [2]. - Many users in the comments express that creating such content without consent constitutes infringement and advocate for reasonable regulations [4]. - The launch of ByteDance's Seedance 2.0 AI video generation model has sparked discussions about copyright, especially after a prominent tech blogger highlighted its capabilities and potential ethical issues [7]. Group 2: Response from Companies and Platforms - In response to the backlash, ByteDance's Seedance 2.0 has temporarily suspended its ability to reference real human materials, indicating a commitment to creating a sustainable creative environment [8]. - The platform acknowledged the unexpected attention and feedback received during the internal testing phase and is working on optimizations to address these concerns [8]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives on AI-Generated Content - Experts warn that unauthorized AI-generated videos featuring celebrities could infringe on personal rights, as facial and vocal likenesses are considered sensitive personal information [10][12]. - According to legal frameworks, creating and distributing such content without authorization violates rights related to image and voice, regardless of whether it is for commercial purposes [12]. - The need for platforms to enhance content review and user awareness regarding copyright is emphasized to maintain a healthy digital ecosystem [13].