科技支撑沈阳市乡村全面振兴

Core Viewpoint - The "Rural Comprehensive Revitalization Plan (2024-2027)" issued by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council emphasizes the dual drive of technology and reform to promote the revitalization of rural industries, talent, culture, ecology, and organization. Group 1: Achievements in Rural Revitalization - Significant progress has been made in agricultural high-quality development in Shenyang, focusing on seed resource creation, smart equipment research and development, and technology service supply [1]. - The seed industry revitalization action has been effectively advanced, with 39 core projects initiated and several varieties recognized as national excellent varieties, leading to a national promotion area of over 15 million mu for new corn varieties [2]. - Agricultural facility equipment levels have steadily improved, with the average loss rates for rice and corn reduced to 1.63% and 1.62%, respectively, and a mechanization rate of over 98% expected for major grain crops by 2025 [3]. - Progress in digital rural construction includes the establishment of 4,000 new 5G base stations, achieving over 98% coverage in administrative villages, and a stable internet penetration rate of over 70% in rural areas [4]. - The green transformation of agriculture has deepened, with a comprehensive utilization rate of livestock and poultry manure reaching 78% and straw utilization achieving over 92% [5]. Group 2: Talent Development in Rural Areas - The rural technology talent team is growing, with over 6,500 young farmers trained, and many obtaining vocational skills and technology management certificates [6]. - Technology special commissioners have been deployed to serve rural areas, with 5,841 instances of service provided across various agricultural districts [7]. Group 3: Challenges in Rural Revitalization - There are still significant shortcomings in agricultural innovation technology, with a need for more original and disruptive innovations to drive transformation [8]. - Cultural revitalization faces challenges due to rural population hollowing, leading to weakened participation in cultural construction and talent outflow [9]. - The integration of digital technology and ecological industries is not yet coordinated, hindering green and low-carbon development [10]. - Organizational revitalization struggles with a "digital divide" and insufficient digital literacy among rural leaders, leading to mismatches in skills and tools [11]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Establish a special fund for technological support in rural revitalization, focusing on original agricultural technology innovation and the development of local characteristic industries [12]. - Innovate the application model for technology transfer, promoting collaboration between academia and industry to enhance rural development [13]. - Enhance regional technological innovation capabilities by fostering cross-regional cooperation and establishing high-standard agricultural technology demonstration bases [14]. - Improve incentives for agricultural technology personnel to work in rural areas, including establishing a project library for rural revitalization technology services [15].