北约3.0不是伙伴关系，是美国的“甩锅计划”？

Core Viewpoint - The absence of U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin at the NATO defense ministers' meeting signals a significant shift in U.S.-European relations, indicating a potential move towards "de-Americanization" of NATO and raising questions about the future of transatlantic defense cooperation [1][2]. Group 1: U.S.-European Relations - The absence of high-level U.S. officials at consecutive NATO meetings reflects a declining emphasis on transatlantic defense by the U.S., leading to a perception of U.S. dissatisfaction and disregard for European allies [2][3]. - The U.S. aims to transition NATO to a "NATO 3.0" model, emphasizing partnerships over dependency, which suggests a shift in defense responsibilities towards Europe [3]. Group 2: Defense Spending Discrepancies - The NATO defense spending target of 5% of GDP remains a contentious issue, with European nations struggling to meet this goal, leading to accusations of double standards from the U.S. [4][5]. - The commitment to increase military spending to 5% by 2035 has been criticized as an unrealistic promise, with many European countries only able to aim for a 2% target in the short term [5]. Group 3: Military Aid to Ukraine - NATO plans to provide approximately $600 billion in military aid to Ukraine by 2026, a nearly 20% increase from the previous year's commitment of $500 billion, highlighting the ongoing support for Ukraine amidst the conflict [5][6]. - The distribution of financial responsibilities for aiding Ukraine reveals underlying tensions, as the U.S. seeks to shift more financial burdens onto European allies while maintaining strategic control [6]. Group 4: Strategic Shifts in NATO - The initiation of the "Arctic Sentinel" military operation by NATO aims to enhance defense capabilities in the Arctic, reflecting a strategic response to Russian activities and the evolving defense landscape [7]. - The U.S. is gradually reducing its military presence in Europe while attempting to maintain control over NATO's strategic direction, indicating a complex rebalancing of defense responsibilities [8]. Group 5: Global Defense Strategy - The simultaneous holding of defense minister meetings in the Americas and Europe illustrates the U.S.'s strategic framework of "dual-line linkage," emphasizing its dominant role in global defense while pushing European allies to assume greater responsibility [9]. - The evolving dynamics within NATO and the broader geopolitical landscape underscore the need for a balanced approach to address both U.S. and European security needs, which will significantly impact future transatlantic relations [9].