王献华：当AI陪着人类“装神弄鬼”，历史学是否会被宣判死刑？

Core Viewpoint - The rise of "folk historical enthusiasm" in China reflects societal progress, as people seek cultural engagement after basic needs are met, highlighting a contrast with the ongoing "crisis in the humanities" [3][4] Group 1: Historical Perspective - The "1644 historical view" represents a confusion in historical perspectives, stemming from a century of Chinese scholars abandoning traditional views in favor of Western academic frameworks [4][12] - The need to reconstruct a genuine historical perspective rooted in Chinese tradition is emphasized, as failure to do so will allow misconceptions like the "1644 historical view" to persist [16][12] Group 2: Role of Professionals - Professionals in the humanities should act as facilitators rather than authoritative figures, providing constructive input without imposing their views on the public [4][7] - The internet has democratized access to historical knowledge, reducing the mystique surrounding the field and allowing non-experts to engage with historical research [7][8] Group 3: Challenges of AI and Misinformation - The advent of AI poses significant challenges to historical accuracy, as AI can generate convincing but false historical narratives, complicating the public's understanding of history [8][9] - The proliferation of misinformation through AI and social media has led to a situation where even experts struggle to counteract false narratives effectively [8][13] Group 4: Educational and Social Responsibilities - There is a call for scholars to bridge the gap between academic knowledge and public understanding, ensuring that their work serves the community effectively [17][19] - The importance of integrating high-level knowledge with practical societal applications is highlighted, as professionals must demonstrate their expertise through meaningful contributions to public discourse [18][19]