Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-02-14 05:05Background - The children's down jacket market is expanding, with increasing demands for safety and comfort due to children's delicate skin and weaker immunity [2] - The China Consumers Association conducted a comparative test on 30 children's down jackets to assess quality and provide consumers with objective information [2] Sample Information - 30 samples were randomly purchased from various offline and online platforms, including well-known brands such as NIKE, Canada Goose, and ZARA [3][4] - Price distribution of the samples: 8 jackets under 300 yuan, 17 between 300-500 yuan, 4 between 500-800 yuan, and 1 over 5000 yuan [3] Testing Standards and Methods - The testing was based on several national standards, including GB 31701-2015 and GB/T 14272-2021, focusing on safety and quality parameters [6][7] - Key testing items included product instructions, fiber composition, formaldehyde content, pH value, and down content [8][10] Test Results and Analysis Product Instructions - Some samples had non-compliant product instructions, with one brand (Dickies) failing to indicate down content [9] Fiber Content and Safety - All 30 samples met the declared fiber composition, and none showed detectable formaldehyde, which is crucial for safety [11][13] - The pH values of all samples ranged from 5.5 to 7.2, within acceptable limits for children's products [14] Down Performance - The down leakage value for 29 samples ranged from 9 to 20 roots/m², meeting the superior quality standard [16] - The fill power and down weight were also tested, with results indicating good insulation performance [18][22] Compliance Issues - Three samples (Beitisi, PUMA, and Yalu) did not meet the required down content and down fiber limits as per national standards [26] Odor Testing - Most samples exhibited no unpleasant odors, although five brands had detectable but mild odors [31] Overall Evaluation - A comprehensive evaluation of the samples showed that most met the relevant standards, with detailed results provided in a comparative table [33]