开启辅助驾驶醉驾睡觉担刑责 最高法首次明确：激活辅助驾驶功能后 驾驶人仍负行车安全责任

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China has issued its first set of guiding cases on road traffic safety criminal cases, emphasizing that the driver remains responsible for ensuring safety even when using advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Implications - Case 271, "Wang Mouqun Dangerous Driving Case," establishes that activating an ADAS does not transfer driving responsibility from the driver to the system [1][4]. - The case highlights that even if a driver uses unauthorized equipment to evade system monitoring, they are still liable as the driving subject [4][5]. - The ruling clarifies that the driver must always be prepared to take control, regardless of the system's capabilities [5][6]. Group 2: Industry Context - The penetration rate of L2-level ADAS in new passenger vehicles in China reached 64% in the first three quarters of 2025, with a year-on-year sales increase of 21.2% [7]. - The rapid adoption of ADAS has raised concerns about misuse and public misunderstanding of the technology's limitations, leading to increased regulatory scrutiny [7][8]. - The regulatory framework for ADAS is evolving, with new standards and guidelines being established to ensure safety and compliance in the industry [8][12]. Group 3: Regulatory Developments - In February 2025, the Ministry of Market Regulation and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued guidelines for the management of L2-level ADAS, establishing a framework for product approval and oversight [8][12]. - A mandatory national standard for L2-level ADAS is set to be implemented by January 1, 2027, which will require systems to operate only under designed conditions and enforce penalties for repeated violations [12][14]. - The introduction of these standards aims to mitigate the risks associated with over-promising capabilities of ADAS and to promote safer driving practices [12][14].