深夜突发！资本大佬被刑拘，东旭系彻底爆雷

Core Viewpoint - The sudden detention of Li Zhaoting, the actual controller of Jialinjie, has caused significant turmoil in the capital market, marking a critical moment in the ongoing issues surrounding the "Dongxu System" and its financial scandals [3][11]. Group 1: Company Overview - Jialinjie (002486.SZ) is currently the only remaining A-share listed company under the "Dongxu System," which has seen the collapse of its other major entities, Dongxu Optoelectronics and Dongxu Lantian [3][10]. - The company specializes in the production and sales of high-end fabric and garments, reporting a revenue of 918 million yuan and a net profit of approximately 51.99 million yuan for the first three quarters of 2025 [5][18]. Group 2: Li Zhaoting's Background and Legal Issues - Li Zhaoting, born in July 1965, was once a prominent figure in the photovoltaic industry and the creator of the "Dongxu System," which peaked with a wealth of 23.5 billion yuan in 2019 [3][16]. - This is not the first time Li has faced regulatory scrutiny; he was previously investigated for information disclosure violations and fined 589 million yuan by the Hebei Securities Regulatory Bureau, resulting in a lifetime ban from the securities market [5][18]. Group 3: The "Dongxu System" Collapse - The "Dongxu System," once a benchmark for private enterprises in Hebei, has faced a significant decline due to high debts and ongoing scandals, with its empire crumbling from a peak of success [6][19]. - Dongxu Optoelectronics, a core platform of the "Dongxu System," was heavily impacted by financial fraud, inflating revenues by 16.76 billion yuan and profits by 5.63 billion yuan from 2015 to 2019 [8][21]. - Dongxu Lantian, initially part of the "Dongxu System," has since distanced itself due to ongoing losses and has become a marginal enterprise [9][22]. Group 4: Market Response and Company Actions - Following Li Zhaoting's detention, Jialinjie quickly issued a statement to distance itself from Li and the "Dongxu System," asserting that he does not hold any position in the company and that operations remain normal [5][18]. - The company emphasized that it has not been asked to assist in any investigations and that control of the company has not changed [5][18].