CFTC 就 Crypto.com 预测市场案向第九巡回法院提交法庭之友意见书

Core Viewpoint - The CFTC supports Cryptocom's claim that its sports event contracts fall under CFTC jurisdiction rather than state gambling laws, emphasizing the economic functions of these contracts [1] Group 1: Regulatory Context - The CFTC filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the dispute between Cryptocom and the state of Nevada [1] - CFTC Chairman Michael Selig stated that event contracts are classified as commodity derivatives and are governed by the Commodity Exchange Act [1] Group 2: Economic Functions - The CFTC highlighted that the economic functions of event contracts include risk hedging, managing portfolio exposure, and providing information on future events [1] - Selig characterized state government intervention as an "expansion of power" [1]