Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, emphasized that any attempt by Japan to exercise "collective self-defense" regarding Taiwan would be considered an act of aggression against China, which would be met with a strong response [1] Group 1: Legal and Historical Context - Fu Cong highlighted that the United Nations Charter establishes the fundamental principle of prohibiting the use of force or threats of force, which is crucial for maintaining post-war international order and preventing a third world war [1] - He criticized Japanese leaders for linking Taiwan to Japan's "survival crisis" and attempting to justify military intervention based on the Japan-U.S. alliance, which he deemed a misinterpretation of international law [1] - The representative asserted that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, and the resolution of the Taiwan issue is a matter of China's internal affairs, with no foreign interference or military action permitted [1] Group 2: International Obligations and Principles - Fu Cong stated that Japan's claims violate its obligations as a defeated nation under international agreements such as the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Proclamation, and Japan's surrender documents [1] - He argued that these claims contravene the United Nations Charter's principles of respecting national sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as non-interference in internal affairs, representing a serious provocation to the post-war international order [1] - The representative called for vigilance and opposition from all peace-loving nations against Japan's attempts to justify military intervention in Taiwan under the guise of "collective self-defense" [1]
中国代表:日本行使“集体自卫权”介入台湾问题 中方必将迎头痛击
Xin Hua She·2026-02-19 01:54