DOJ probes how Warner Bros. sale could impact movie theaters, potentially lead to fewer new films

Core Viewpoint - The Justice Department is investigating the potential impact of a sale of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) to Netflix on the film industry, particularly regarding fewer new film releases and the implications for moviegoers [1][4]. Group 1: Investigation and Concerns - Federal antitrust lawyers are in discussions with major movie theater chains to assess the implications of the potential sale [2][11]. - The investigation is focused on whether a merger between Netflix and HBO Max would create a monopoly in the streaming industry [4]. - Concerns have been raised that a Netflix acquisition could negatively affect Hollywood, as Netflix typically does not release its original films in theaters [5]. Group 2: Competitive Bidding and Industry Reactions - Warner Bros. has resumed negotiations with Paramount Skydance after they improved their offer for WBD, which includes cable assets [5][14]. - Paramount has expressed that a sale to Netflix would not enhance competition but rather diminish it, citing concerns over the financial burden it would face post-acquisition [6]. - Industry figures, including James Cameron, have warned that a Netflix deal could be detrimental to cinemas [7]. Group 3: Netflix's Position and Promises - Netflix has criticized Paramount's actions as distractions and claims that its acquisition would provide more choices and value to audiences [8]. - Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos has promised to release all WBD films in theaters exclusively for 45 days, attempting to alleviate industry concerns [10]. - Some theater executives remain skeptical about Netflix's commitment to theatrical releases, seeking more concrete assurances [12]. Group 4: Investor and Regulatory Dynamics - Confidence is growing within Paramount that WBD may abandon the Netflix deal due to potential regulatory challenges [13]. - Activist investor Ancora Holdings, with a nearly $200 million stake in WBD, plans to oppose the Netflix deal, arguing that the board did not adequately engage with Paramount [13].