TransDigm's 47.2% Operating Margin Crushes GE's 21.4%. Why Does GE Still Get the Higher Valuation?

Core Insights - The global backlog of unfilled aircraft orders exceeds 17,000 jets, with Boeing facing production delays that extend delivery timelines, resulting in an average fleet age of 15 years [1] - GE Aerospace and TransDigm Group are two major beneficiaries of this situation, each profiting in distinct ways [1] GE Aerospace - GE Aerospace has an installed base of approximately 80,000 commercial and military engines, generating service revenue of $24 billion in 2025, a 26% increase year-over-year, which constitutes 53% of total revenue [2] - Management projects $8.2 billion in free cash flow (FCF) for 2026, with FCF conversion exceeding 100%, and maintains a clean balance sheet compared to TransDigm's higher leverage [4] - GE trades at about 43 times estimated 2026 earnings, reflecting a market expectation of flawless execution and a pure-play razor-and-blade model [5] - GE generated $7.3 billion in free cash flow in fiscal 2025, with a gross margin of 36.64% and a dividend yield of 0.43% [10][11] TransDigm Group - TransDigm specializes in manufacturing thousands of small, mission-critical components for aircraft, holding a sole-source and proprietary position for many parts, which grants significant pricing power [6] - The company reported an operating margin of 47.2% in fiscal 2025, significantly higher than GE's 21.4%, and returned $5 billion to shareholders through special dividends [7] - TransDigm's leverage is more than four times that of GE, and its pricing model has faced regulatory scrutiny [7] - TransDigm produced $1.8 billion in free cash flow, with a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 32 times [11] Investment Considerations - GE is positioned as a safer investment option, appealing to those willing to pay a premium for stability, while TransDigm attracts investors seeking higher profitability despite its debt levels [12]