一图读懂｜最高法院判特朗普关税违宪，剩余五张“关税牌”

Group 1 - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that former President Trump's large-scale tariffs were illegal, emphasizing that the term "regulation" in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not include taxation [5][7][8] - The ruling indicates that the government must address the process of refunding approximately $170 billion in tariffs collected from over 300,000 importers, although the court did not provide specific guidance on how this should be done [9][10] - The Supreme Court's decision is expected to create significant administrative challenges in managing the refund process, as acknowledged by Justice Kavanaugh during oral arguments [10][11] Group 2 - The ruling has implications for the authority of Congress regarding regulatory and taxation powers, highlighting the need for clear delineation in legislation [5][6] - The decision may lead to a reevaluation of existing tariffs and their legal basis, particularly those implemented under emergency powers [16] - The court's majority opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts, with dissenting opinions from Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who argued for broader presidential powers in emergencies [7][8]