Larry Elder: There are ‘other ways' to implement tariffs

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs is seen as a setback for the U.S. government, particularly affecting President Trump's ability to impose tariffs as a tool for foreign policy and national security [1][10]. Group 1: Tariff Implementation - President Trump announced the imposition of a 10% global tariff under section 122, in addition to existing tariffs, to combat unfair trading practices [2][6]. - The ruling allows the president to maintain trade embargos against entire nations, indicating that while tariffs are limited, other forms of trade restrictions remain available [3][10]. Group 2: Impact on National Security - The removal of certain tariff powers is viewed as detrimental to national security, particularly in light of previous successful tariffs that led to a decline in fentanyl deaths [8][12]. - The Supreme Court's decision is perceived as diminishing the president's leverage in negotiations, although it still allows for full embargoes [10][11]. Group 3: Political Implications - The ruling has sparked discussions about the balance of power between the presidency and Congress regarding trade policies, with some suggesting it may affect future judicial appointments and political strategies [5][6]. - The ongoing debate highlights the importance of tariffs in protecting U.S. jobs and industries, as emphasized by various political figures [7].