中国代表：安理会改革不能只让极少数国家从中受益

Core Viewpoint - The reform of the UN Security Council should not benefit only a few powerful countries, and it is essential to ensure broader representation and participation from developing nations and regions [1][2] Group 1: Reform Necessity - The UN Security Council has not changed significantly in over 80 years, with 59 member countries never having entered the Council [2] - There is a need for correct reform methods to enhance the representation and voice of developing countries, particularly addressing historical injustices faced by Africa [2] - The reform should reflect the multipolar trend and the rise of the Global South, ensuring that decisions are more democratic and efficient [1] Group 2: Regional Representation - Countries participating in the Security Council should represent regional interests and gain broad recognition from their respective regions [1] - There is an openness to the idea of fixed regional seats and rotating positions, which reflects the latest thoughts among member states [1] - The emphasis is on correcting historical imbalances and prioritizing the demands of African nations in the reform process [2] Group 3: Security Council Responsibilities - The Security Council must take on the primary responsibility of maintaining international peace and security amidst complex global challenges [2] - A strategic and long-term perspective is necessary for planning reforms, rather than focusing solely on the current world order [2] Group 4: Criticism of Japan - Japan's refusal to reflect on its historical aggression and its interference in other countries' sovereignty poses new threats to regional peace and stability [2] - Such a country lacks the qualifications to demand a permanent seat on the Security Council [2]