美方高调极限施压，伊朗声称做好战争准备，特朗普“好奇”伊朗为何不屈服

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming negotiations between the U.S. and Iran in Geneva on the 26th are seen as a critical moment, with the U.S. considering military action if Iran does not comply with demands [1][3][4]. Group 1: Negotiation Context - The U.S. and Iran are set to discuss Iran's detailed nuclear proposal, with the U.S. demanding "zero enrichment" of uranium, although there is a possibility for Iran to retain "symbolic enrichment" if it can prove its proposal effectively blocks nuclear weapon development [3][4]. - The negotiations are perceived as potentially the last opportunity for Iran before the U.S. considers large-scale military action [3]. Group 2: Military Threats and Responses - President Trump has indicated a preference for initial military strikes against Iran to compel compliance, with broader military options remaining on the table if necessary [4][5]. - Iran's officials have stated that any U.S. attack would be viewed as an act of aggression, and they would respond accordingly, emphasizing their right to self-defense [5][6]. Group 3: Historical Context and Strategic Implications - The ongoing U.S. strategy towards Iran has been characterized as a continuation of failed tactics employed by previous administrations, with a historical pattern of pressure failing to yield desired results [7]. - Analysts suggest that the current geopolitical tensions could lead to significant instability if the U.S. escalates military actions in response to domestic pressures [8].