规则失范伤公平，多方调研探治理——平台规则制定权滥用与规制调研纪实

Group 1 - The core issue of platform rule-making authority has become a key topic affecting fair competition and the high-quality development of the digital economy, especially with the upcoming amendments to the Anti-Unfair Competition Law in 2025 [1] - The amendments will include provisions against the "abuse of platform rules," introducing new articles that raise questions about the effective implementation of these principles in law enforcement and judicial practices [1][2] - The research team from Nanjing Normal University Law School aims to explore the current state of platform rule-making authority and the governance challenges through a comprehensive survey [1][4] Group 2 - The research team has systematically reviewed 39 core documents and established a case database of 284 judicial cases, highlighting the intent of national management over platform rules while noting existing academic disagreements on their legal attributes [2] - The study identifies practical challenges in platform rule governance, such as inconsistent standards for recognition and difficulties in evidence collection, which will guide future field research [2][4] Group 3 - Interviews with lawyers revealed that the new amendments address emerging unfair competition issues related to new platform types, but there are still gaps in defining abuse and quantifying losses, leading to unclear paths for rights protection [4][5] - Insights from law enforcement personnel emphasized the need for procedural justice and substantive fairness in platform rule governance, pointing out operational challenges like jurisdictional definitions and evidence integrity [4][5] Group 4 - A survey conducted by the research team highlighted consumer experiences and rights concerns, indicating a need for improved transparency and governance in platform rules, as users reported issues with rule changes and data misuse [5][14] - The team has initiated a series of reports focusing on platform rule governance, aiming to raise public awareness and propose legislative and regulatory improvements based on the findings [14][15] Group 5 - The research team has engaged in public education efforts to enhance awareness of platform rule abuses, utilizing various outreach methods to inform the public about their rights and the legal avenues available for dispute resolution [15][16] - The ongoing exploration of platform rule-making authority and governance challenges reflects a commitment to ensuring fair competition in the digital age, with plans for continued advocacy and legal education [16]