三大国产 AI 遭点名！Anthropic「贼喊捉贼」，马斯克贴脸嘲讽

Core Insights - Anthropic has accused three domestic AI companies—DeepSeek, Kimi, and MiniMax—of conducting "distillation attacks" to extract capabilities from its Claude model, claiming these companies used approximately 24,000 accounts and engaged in over 16 million conversations with Claude [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Anthropic's claims include that DeepSeek conducted 150,000 conversations primarily targeting reasoning capabilities, while Kimi engaged in 3.4 million conversations focusing on agent reasoning, tool usage, programming, and computer vision [3]. - MiniMax is reported to have the largest scale of interaction, with over 13 million conversations aimed at agent programming and tool invocation [3]. - The company has described the proxy architecture used by these firms as a "Hydra cluster," which involves managing over 20,000 accounts across various platforms, complicating detection efforts [5]. Group 2: Controversies and Historical Context - Anthropic has faced scrutiny for its own practices, including a secret project named "Project Panama," which involved destructively scanning and digitizing books without consent, processing between 500,000 to 2 million books at a cost of tens of millions of dollars [5]. - The company has also been involved in legal disputes over using pirated e-book libraries for model training, resulting in a $1.5 billion settlement in 2025 [5]. - Public reactions have highlighted the irony of Anthropic's accusations, questioning the ethical implications of its own data sourcing practices [6]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - Elon Musk has commented on the situation, questioning the audacity of these companies in light of Anthropic's own history of data acquisition [7]. - The ongoing debate raises critical questions about intellectual property and ethical standards in AI development [8].