曾指挥强掳马杜罗、打击伊朗核设施的美军参联会主席：盟友不帮、弹药不足，咋打伊朗

Core Viewpoint - The potential military action against Iran by the Trump administration is fraught with significant risks, particularly due to ammunition shortages and lack of support from regional allies [1][3]. Group 1: Military Action Risks - General Mark Milley has warned that military action against Iran could lead to prolonged conflict, especially given the current depletion of U.S. ammunition reserves due to ongoing support for Israel and Ukraine [3]. - The scale of military strikes against Iran could vary significantly based on Trump's objectives, with potential targets ranging from hundreds to thousands, depending on whether the focus is on missile programs or regime change [2][3]. - The U.S. military's ability to defend against Iranian missiles relies on critical systems like THAAD and Patriot missiles, but production rates are lagging behind consumption rates [3][5]. Group 2: Political Dynamics - Trump's anxiety over Iran stems from a desire to leverage military action to gain an advantage in negotiations, but military officials have cautioned that any strike would likely entangle the U.S. in a complex conflict [2][7]. - The lack of support from regional allies complicates military operations, as logistical challenges arise from restrictions on airspace and the need to strike numerous targets across Iran [7]. - Trump's public denial of Milley's warnings reflects his desire to project confidence, yet it also highlights the underlying tensions and uncertainties regarding U.S. military strategy in the region [7].