ALB vs. SQM: Which Lithium Stock Deserves a Spot in Your Portfolio?
ZACKS·2026-02-26 14:56

Core Insights - Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) are key players in the lithium market, benefiting from rising lithium prices due to increased demand from electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems, alongside supply disruptions, particularly in China [1][8][26] Group 1: Albemarle Corporation (ALB) - ALB is positioned for long-term growth in the battery-grade lithium market, with lithium demand expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10-20% from 2025 to 2030, driven by EV penetration and stationary storage [3][4] - The company has achieved over 30% year-over-year growth in lithium demand and anticipates a further increase of 15-40% in demand for the current year [3] - ALB has implemented cost-saving measures, achieving approximately $450 million in cost and productivity improvements for 2025, exceeding its target of $300-$400 million, and expects an additional $100-$150 million in improvements for 2026 [5] - The company has a liquidity position of around $3.2 billion, with cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.6 billion, and generated an operating cash flow of around $1.3 billion in 2025, reflecting an 86% increase from the previous year [7] - ALB's stock has surged 155.1% over the past year, indicating strong market performance [17] Group 2: Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) - SQM is benefiting from being a low-cost producer in the lithium market, with record lithium sales volumes reported in the third quarter of 2025, driven by strong demand from EVs and energy storage systems [10][12] - The company has a total capital expenditure projection of $2.7 billion for 2025-2027, aimed at expanding lithium carbonate and hydroxide capacity in Chile and developing projects in Australia [13] - SQM's strategic partnership with Codelco enhances its position in the Atacama salt flat, expected to support lithium production until 2060 [14][15] - The company ended the third quarter with cash and cash equivalents of roughly $1.5 billion and generated an operating cash flow of approximately $756 million in the first nine months of 2025 [16] - SQM's stock has rallied 100.6% over the past year, showcasing robust performance [17] Group 3: Comparative Analysis - Both ALB and SQM hold a Zacks Rank 1 (Strong Buy), making it challenging to choose between them [25] - SQM appears to have a valuation edge over ALB, with a forward price-to-sales ratio of 3.21 compared to ALB's 4.23, indicating a more attractive investment opportunity [18][20] - SQM's return on equity (ROE) stands at 9.8%, significantly higher than ALB's 0.4%, reflecting more efficient use of shareholder funds [19] - The consensus estimates for 2026 suggest a year-over-year sales growth of 53.1% and EPS growth of 180.1% for SQM, compared to ALB's 7.9% sales growth and 984.8% EPS growth [23][24]