Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-02-27 08:17Core Viewpoint - The final ruling of the US International Trade Commission (ITC) determined that all six patent infringement claims made by GoPro against the company were unfounded, allowing the company to continue importing and selling its products in the US without restrictions [1][2]. Group 1: ITC Ruling and Impact - The ITC upheld its initial ruling, stating that five out of the six patent disputes raised by GoPro were either not infringed or the related patents were invalid [1][2]. - For the remaining design patent, the company's new design proposal was also confirmed by the ITC as non-infringing [1][2]. Group 2: Company Response and Costs - The company indicated that the 337 investigation did not have a substantial impact on its production or operations [1][2]. - The founder of the company mentioned that the legal costs incurred for the defense exceeded 10 million USD, highlighting that many companies might not be able to afford such legal battles [1][2]. Group 3: Market Position and Supply Chain - The founder emphasized that the company's market performance has surpassed that of GoPro, attributing this success to well-defined products and the significant advantages provided by the Chinese supply chain [1][2].