对“无堂食”商家划分，还可在实践中细化

Core Viewpoint - The new regulations issued by the State Administration for Market Regulation on February 26 require delivery-only restaurants to prominently display a "no dine-in" sign on their main page, with delivery platforms also required to show this sign on merchant listing pages. This regulation is seen as a targeted measure against "ghost kitchens" [1] Group 1: Definition and Scope of "No Dine-In" Restaurants - The term "no dine-in" encompasses a broader range of establishments than just "ghost kitchens," which are typically defined by discrepancies between registered and actual locations. Many "no dine-in" restaurants have fixed operating locations [1] - The definition of "no dine-in" is complex, as establishments with minimal dine-in facilities may not clearly fall into this category. The binary classification of "dine-in" versus "no dine-in" may be overly simplistic [1] Group 2: Risks and Regulatory Focus - Not all delivery-only restaurants are inherently riskier or less trustworthy than dine-in establishments. The real concern lies with those "no dine-in" merchants that appear suddenly, frequently change identities, and offer significantly lower prices with high short-term sales [2] - The new regulations mandate that delivery platforms verify the actual operating addresses of merchants at least every six months, which increases the responsibility of platforms for on-the-ground inspections and necessitates the establishment of dedicated teams for this purpose [2]