司法部发布第四批涉企执法典型案例 规范执法营造更好营商环境

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Justice has released the fourth batch of typical cases regarding the regulation of administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, showcasing effective practices in addressing issues, promoting responsibilities, and coordinating efforts to support the construction of a unified national market [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement Practices - Various regions are expanding enterprise participation and enhancing institutional restructuring and source governance to continuously optimize the legal business environment [1]. - A case from Hainan demonstrated the use of the "12345" hotline mechanism to quickly respond to enterprise demands and correct issues of inaction by the county's comprehensive law enforcement bureau [1]. - The systematic thinking of "handling one case, regulating one domain" is highlighted, indicating a future focus on breaking administrative monopolies and ensuring equal access for various business entities [1]. Group 2: Market Regulation and Competition - The key to building a unified national market lies in eliminating regulations and practices that hinder fair competition [2]. - A case from Jiangxi revealed that a local government’s announcement regarding shared electric bikes violated the guidelines for national market construction by imposing a "registration and approval system" [2]. - The need to shift administrative law enforcement supervision from temporary measures to a normalized and institutionalized approach is emphasized, addressing issues of blurred responsibilities and lack of coordination across departments [2]. Group 3: Future Directions - The Ministry of Justice will continue to guide localities in deepening the regulation of administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, enhancing the coordination and source governance of administrative law enforcement supervision [3]. - There is a focus on improving the precision and effectiveness of administrative law enforcement supervision to transform institutional advantages into governance efficiency, creating a stable, fair, transparent, and predictable legal business environment for enterprise development [3].