人工智能行业：中国和英国的专家如何看待AI风险和合作（英译中）

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The report highlights the shared concerns and priorities of AI experts from China and the UK regarding AI risks and collaboration, particularly in the context of open-source AI [1][24] - It emphasizes the importance of international cooperation to address AI risks effectively, despite geopolitical uncertainties and cultural differences [18][19] Summary by Sections Introduction - The advancements in AI offer significant societal, economic, and scientific benefits, with open-source AI playing a crucial role in accelerating innovation and democratizing AI capabilities [2] Open Source AI - Both China and the UK are active members of the open-source community and have produced leading open-source AI projects, such as Alibaba's Qwe and 01.AI's Yi [3] - Open-source AI presents unique challenges, including the potential for malicious use and the lack of accountability for known errors or security vulnerabilities [3][10] AI Safety Priorities - Experts identified three categories of risks: safety risks, social risks, and existential risks, with concerns about the accuracy and reliability of AI systems being paramount [8][9] - Specific social risks include the misuse of AI for fraud and ethical implications of AI use with children [9] Open Source AI Benefits and Risks - Experts agree that open-source AI models allow for thorough examination and collaboration, but they also express concerns about malicious use and data privacy violations [11][12] AI Regulation - Experts from both countries find their approaches to AI regulation reasonable, with the UK focusing on sector-based regulation and China considering the "Model AI Law (MAIL) v.2.0" [13][14] International Cooperation - International cooperation is deemed essential for addressing AI risks, with experts highlighting geopolitical uncertainty as a significant barrier [18][19] - Cultural differences and the lack of technical experts in international dialogues are also seen as obstacles to effective collaboration [22] Conclusion - The report concludes that the shared concerns of experts from both countries can serve as a foundation for future collaboration, particularly in open-source AI [24]