美国发展融资需要停止奖励那些政策伤害美国公司和工人的国家（英译中）

Investment Rating - The report suggests that the U.S. Development Finance Corporation (DFC) should stop funding countries that engage in unfair trade practices detrimental to U.S. companies and workers, indicating a need for a reevaluation of investment strategies [2][4][21]. Core Insights - The DFC was established to counter China's Belt and Road Initiative and to support U.S. companies in expanding their global market presence. However, it has been criticized for funding projects in countries that harm U.S. interests through unfair trade practices [2][4]. - Over half of DFC funding has gone to countries with inadequate intellectual property policies, and 43% has been directed to nations with digital trade barriers, highlighting a misalignment with U.S. economic interests [2][4][12]. - The report emphasizes the necessity for Congress to impose stricter standards on DFC to evaluate how recipient countries' trade policies impact U.S. technological and economic interests [2][4][21]. Summary by Sections Introduction - Development finance is a crucial tool for advancing U.S. foreign policy and supporting U.S. exports, particularly in competition with China. The report argues that U.S. development policy must adapt to current global realities, where many countries employ unfair economic policies against U.S. interests [4][5]. DFC Mission, Standards, and Funding - The DFC aims to promote private investment in developing countries, with a total investment portfolio expected to exceed $40 billion in FY2023. The DFC's operations must align with U.S. economic interests, yet current standards for evaluating trade commitments from recipient countries are insufficient [8][9][21]. Geopolitical Competition and Trade Barriers - The report discusses the increasing importance of strong intellectual property protections and the impact of digital trade barriers on U.S. companies. Many DFC recipient countries have weak IP laws and impose digital trade restrictions that hinder U.S. market access [12][15][16]. Recommendations - The report recommends that Congress establish mandatory standards for assessing potential partner countries' trade and technology barriers, ensuring that DFC projects align with U.S. economic interests. It suggests that DFC should reference USTR's Special 301 report and National Trade Estimates to evaluate compliance with IP and digital trade standards [21][22].