人工智能伦理风险与治理研究

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The report emphasizes the urgent need to optimize and improve the governance path for artificial intelligence (AI) ethics in China, as the technology rapidly permeates various sectors, raising ethical concerns globally [4][6] - It identifies five major ethical risks associated with AI, including infringement risks, discrimination risks, social risks, accountability risks, and uncontrollability risks [14] - The report outlines the current governance practices in international contexts, particularly in the EU and the US, and compares them with China's evolving governance framework [26][30][31] Summary by Sections Governance Status - The report discusses the current state of AI ethical risk governance, highlighting the need for a comprehensive legal framework and the establishment of regulatory bodies to address ethical concerns [31][32] - It notes that China has begun to explore specific governance practices, including the introduction of laws and regulations aimed at managing AI-related ethical risks [32][33] Ethical Risks - The report categorizes AI ethical risks into five dimensions: infringement risks (direct violations of personal rights), discrimination risks (unjust outcomes for specific groups), social risks (negative impacts on societal order), accountability risks (difficulties in defining responsibility), and uncontrollability risks (loss of human control over AI) [14] International Practices - The report reviews international governance practices, noting that the EU has a more rigid and systematic approach, while the US emphasizes flexibility and voluntary compliance [26][30] - It highlights various international agreements and initiatives aimed at establishing ethical standards for AI, such as the "Bletchley Declaration" and the "Seoul Declaration" [18][19] Optimization Path Suggestions - The report suggests several paths for optimizing AI ethical governance, including enhancing the legal framework, strengthening multi-party collaborative governance mechanisms, and deepening international cooperation [11][55] - It emphasizes the importance of balancing technological advancement with ethical safety, addressing the complex relationship between technology development and ethical governance [46][49]