2025Q2主动权益型基金季报点评：主动权益基金经理在关注哪些方向？

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided in the content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In 2025Q2, the A-share market showed a volatile upward trend with significant structural differentiation and style rotation. The median return of active equity funds was 1.90%, outperforming major indices such as the CSI 300 and CSI 500. Nearly 70% of stocks in the whole market recorded positive returns [3]. - As of the end of Q2 2025, the total scale of active equity funds was 3.29 trillion yuan, a decrease of 0.04 trillion yuan from the previous quarter. In Q1 2025, there was a net outflow of 113.407 billion yuan from active equity funds [6]. - Different - style and theme fund managers had diverse investment strategies and outlooks. For example, value - style fund managers focused on undervalued traditional assets and looked for opportunities in some consumer and cyclical sectors; growth - style fund managers concentrated on long - term growth companies and adopted a "boom - mining + balanced allocation" strategy [21][23]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Active Equity - Type Fund 2025 Second - Quarter Report Data Review 3.1.1 Performance Review - In Q2 2025, the A - share market was volatile. After a brief decline in early April due to US tariff policies, it stabilized from mid - April to mid - May and saw theme rotations since June. The Guozheng 2000 and ChiNext 50 recorded relatively high positive returns of 4.41% and 3.19% respectively. The median return of active equity funds was 1.90%, and the median stock price change was 5.39% [3]. 3.1.2 Scale and Fund Flow - As of the end of Q2 2025, the total scale of active equity funds was 3.29 trillion yuan, down from 3.33 trillion yuan in the previous quarter. In Q1 2025, there was a net outflow of 113.407 billion yuan from active equity funds. Funds with a fund - flow change ratio < - 1% accounted for 74.34%, while those with a net inflow ≥ 1% accounted for only 16.51% [6]. 3.1.3 Position Change - As of Q2 2025, the average stock position of active equity funds was 87.23%, with an average position change of 1.15%. The average active position change was 1.18%, and the average natural position change was - 0.04%. 39.57% of funds adjusted their active positions by 0 - 5%, and 33.76% adjusted by - 5% - 0 [9]. 3.1.4 Industry Allocation - The top five industries for increased holdings were communication, medicine, non - bank finance, banking, and national defense and military industry. The top five industries for reduced holdings were food and beverage, automobile, commerce and retail, power equipment and new energy, and machinery. Five industries had over - allocation reductions, and nine industries had under - allocation increases [12]. 3.1.5 Individual Stock Heavy - Holdings - The top ten heavy - holding stocks by market value included Tencent Holdings, CATL, Kweichow Moutai, etc. The top ten heavy - holding stocks by the number of holding funds included CATL, Tencent Holdings, Zijin Mining, etc. The stocks with the largest increase in market value of heavy - holdings included Zhongji Innolight, New H3C Semiconductor Technology, etc., while those with the largest decrease included BYD, Alibaba - W, etc. [15][16][18] 3.2 Second - Quarter Report Fund Manager Views Summary 3.2.1 Value Style - Since 2022, value - style funds have attracted more attention. In 2025, they faced headwinds. Many value - style fund managers believed that undervalued stocks were still worth buying. In terms of position structure, most did not significantly adjust their allocations and focused on traditional undervalued assets, while also looking for opportunities in some consumer and cyclical sectors [21]. 3.2.2 Growth Style - Affected by overseas uncertainties and domestic policies, the market was volatile. Growth - style fund managers adhered to selecting long - term growth companies and adopted a "boom - mining + balanced allocation" strategy. They focused on AI, innovation drugs, and some emerging consumption sectors [23]. 3.2.3 Balanced Style - Balanced - style fund managers selected stocks from multiple dimensions and controlled portfolio risks through diversification. In the context of increased market risk appetite, many reduced holdings in traditional industries and high - dividend consumer stocks and increased holdings in growth stocks and booming industries [25]. 3.2.4 Consumption Theme - Traditional consumption showed differentiation and repair. New consumption had structural opportunities, but the sustainability and space of consumption trends needed to be judged. Some fund managers made structural adjustments in traditional consumption and increased investment in new consumption [27]. 3.2.5 Medicine Theme - Innovation drugs became a consensus. Some fund managers also looked for investment targets with low growth this year, such as innovative medical devices, CXO, and pharmacies [29]. 3.2.6 TMT Theme - The AI industry chain developed rapidly. TMT - theme fund managers continued to focus on AI - related companies and also paid attention to other technology sectors such as robotics and semiconductors [31]. 3.2.7 High - End Manufacturing - The attention to the military industry increased. High - end manufacturing showed competitive advantages, and some fund managers expected the recovery of some electro - new energy sectors [33]. 3.2.8 Cycle Theme - Resource sectors had long - term investment logic. Dividend - type cycle assets had allocation significance, and banks were still the core of the dividend sector [35]. 3.2.9 Hong Kong Stock Theme - Most fund managers were relatively optimistic about Hong Kong stocks. Some adjusted their positions from crowded sectors to the technology sector with lower valuations and expected performance growth [37].