花旗：贸易战后续走向如何？博弈论给出的答案

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry or companies involved Core Insights - The Game Theory framework indicates that the current tariff regime between the US and China represents a Nash equilibrium, where both sides are better off maintaining the status quo rather than escalating tariffs further [5][19][29] - China’s recent restrictions on rare earth elements (REE) have led to a significant increase in its projected losses, from $76 billion under the trade truce to $212 billion due to new tariffs [19][21] - The US is projected to gain $219 billion instead of $67 billion due to the new tariff regime, despite the loss of REE supply [20][21] Summary by Sections Trade War Dynamics - The report discusses the implications of the trade war, particularly focusing on the tariffs imposed by both the US and China, and how these tariffs affect bilateral trade [3][16] - The introduction of tariffs has led to an expected 18.1% decline in Chinese exports to the US and a 3.4% drop in US exports to China [37][41] Tariff Projections - The US is expected to collect $82.2 billion in tariffs from Chinese exports, while China will collect around $13.5 billion from US exports [41][46] - The current tariff regime of 30% on Chinese goods and 10% on US goods is seen as more favorable for China compared to previous higher tariffs [51][54] Rare Earth Elements (REE) - The report highlights the strategic importance of REE in the trade war, noting that China has a near-monopoly on REE processing, accounting for 99% of global production [54][70] - The US is currently reliant on China for 70% of its REE, but plans are in place to reduce this dependency by 2027 [70][81] Future Expectations - The report anticipates that China will likely impose retaliatory tariffs of 110% in response to the US tariffs, which would further escalate the trade war [26][27] - The potential for a renewed trade agreement at the upcoming APEC summit is contingent on China's actions regarding retaliatory tariffs [30][31]