Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The report highlights the importance of open source AI in fostering innovation, collaboration, and democratizing access to AI technologies, while also addressing the associated risks and challenges [2][4][5] - Both China and the United Kingdom are recognized as leaders in open source AI, with significant contributions from companies like Stability AI in the UK and top-performing models from Chinese firms like Alibaba [4] - The report emphasizes the need for international collaboration to address AI risks, with both countries sharing common concerns and priorities regarding AI safety [6][33] Summary by Sections Introduction - Recent advancements in AI provide societal, economic, and scientific benefits, particularly through open source AI, which accelerates innovation and democratizes access [2] Methodology - The study utilized qualitative research methods, conducting in-depth interviews with 24 experts from academia and industry in the UK and China to gather insights on AI risks and collaboration [9][10] Findings and Discussion - Key themes identified include AI safety priorities, benefits and risks of open source AI, AI regulations, and barriers to international collaboration [14] Top Priorities for AI Safety - Experts expressed concerns about safety risks, societal risks, and existential risks associated with AI, highlighting issues such as misuse, ethical implications, and potential global catastrophes [15][16] Benefits and Risks of Open Source AI - Open source AI models are seen as beneficial for quality improvement and collaboration, but experts are concerned about malicious use and data privacy violations [18][19] AI Regulations - Experts from both nations view their regulatory approaches as reasonable, with the UK advocating for a pro-innovation approach and China considering a new AI regulation law [21][22] International Collaboration on AI - Geopolitical uncertainties and cultural differences are identified as significant barriers to collaboration, despite a shared recognition of the importance of working together on AI safety [27][28] Conclusion - The report concludes that shared concerns between the UK and China can serve as a foundation for future collaboration, particularly in the realm of open source AI [33][34]

WTO ITC UNCTAD World Tariff Profiles 2024 SPECIAL TOPIC World Tariff Profiles 2024Tariffs on critical minerals in the electric vehicle value chain About this publication World Tariff Profiles is a co-publication of the WTO, ITC and UNCTAD on market access for goods. This annual publication provides comprehensive information on the tariffs and non-tariff measures imposed by over 170 countries and customs territories. Non-WTO members are included if data on the tariffs they applied in 2023 or 2022 are availab ...

THE ENERGY SECTOR OF PANAMA CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION CHALLENGES © IRENA 2024 Unless otherwise stated, material in this publication may be freely used, shared, copied, reproduced, printed and/or stored, provided that appropriate acknowledgement is given of IRENA as the source and copyright holder. Material in this publication that is attributed to third parties may be subject to separate terms of use and restrictions, and appropriate permissions from these third parties may need to be secured before any use ...

Executive Summary Madrid Yearly Review 2024 Executive Summary Madrid Yearly Review 2024 International Registration of Marks This executive brief identifies key trends in the use of the WIPO-administered Madrid System. For fuller statistics, see the Madrid Yearly Review 2024 – available in English at www.wipo.int/ipstats Key numbers for 2023 64,200 (−7.0%) Madrid international applications1 448,340 (−7.8%) Designations in international applications 63,618 (−7.2%) Madrid international registrations 64,335 (+8 ...

Investment Rating - The report indicates a positive outlook for the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs, with a general increase in applications and registrations, suggesting a favorable investment environment in the design protection sector [4][28]. Core Insights - The Hague System saw a 7.4% increase in international applications in 2023, totaling 8,566 applications, and a record number of designs contained in these applications reached 25,414, marking a modest growth of 1.3% [3][4]. - The long-term trend shows that the number of designs registered through the Hague System has more than doubled over the past decade, increasing from 11,869 in 2013 to 25,262 in 2023 [28]. - Germany remains the top user of the international design system despite an 8% decrease in 2023, while China experienced significant growth of 46.9%, consolidating its position as the second-largest user [10][11]. Summary by Sections International Applications and Registrations - In 2023, international applications grew by 7.4% to reach 8,566 applications, with designs contained in these applications totaling 25,414, reflecting a modest increase of 1.3% [3][4][6]. - The number of international registrations increased by 8.3% to 8,366, with designs in registrations amounting to 25,262, a slight increase of 0.5% [28][30]. Geographic Distribution - Applicants from at least 68 countries filed international applications, with Germany leading at 4,518 designs, followed by China (3,758) and the US (2,674) [10][11]. - In 2023, Europe accounted for 60.2% of all designs filed, while Asia's share increased significantly from 3.9% in 2013 to 28% in 2023 due to the accession of several Asian countries to the Hague System [13][14]. Design Classes - Designs related to means of transport accounted for 11.1% of all designs in 2023, followed by recording and communication equipment at 8.6% and furnishing at 7.6% [25][26]. - Notable growth was observed in clothing designs (+33.8%) and equipment for electricity production (+32.4%) [25][27]. Active Registrations - As of 2023, there were approximately 56,567 international registrations in force, containing around 213,318 designs, with a 9.2% increase from the previous year [32][33]. - The top six countries held about 68.9% of all active designs, although their combined share decreased from 76% in 2018 to 69% in 2023 [32][33]. Financial Aspects - The average fee for a Hague international registration in 2023 was CHF 2,097, reflecting a slight increase from the previous year [38][39]. - The International Bureau distributed approximately CHF 14.4 million to designated members in 2023, with the US receiving the largest share at 23.1% [35][36].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry or companies discussed Core Insights - The U.S. Development Finance Corporation (DFC) is criticized for funding projects in countries that engage in unfair trade practices detrimental to U.S. companies and jobs [3][5][6] - Over half of DFC funding is allocated to countries with substandard intellectual property policies, and 43% goes to those with digital trade barriers [3][9] - The report emphasizes the need for Congress to establish stronger criteria for assessing how recipient countries' trade policies affect U.S. techno-economic interests [3][10] Summary by Sections Key Takeaways - Development financing should align with U.S. foreign policy goals while supporting U.S. firms against unfair trade practices [3] - Countries like Brazil, India, and Turkey benefit from DFC financing despite their harmful trade practices [3] Introduction - U.S. development policy must adapt to the current global economic landscape, where the U.S. is no longer the dominant techno-economic power [5][6] Recommendations - Congress should create mandatory criteria for assessing trade and technology barriers in potential partner countries [9][10] - The DFC's reauthorization process should be used to ensure alignment with U.S. techno-economic interests [10][33] Conclusion - U.S. development programs must be tied to trade and technology barriers to prevent countries from benefiting while enacting policies that harm U.S. firms [37][38]

ab 13 August 2024 Global Research and Evidence Lab First Read Netwealth Group Limited UBS Snapshot: FY24 Result ONE LINER Earnings and div miss due to revenue margins. FY25 guidance is for flows to remain strong but cost growth to accelerate. KEY NUMBERS (1) Reported NPAT $83.4m vs UBSe $88.1m (Cons $85.6m); (2) Total revenue +18.9% to $255.2m vs UBSe $260.4m (Cons $258.4m); (3) EBITDA $124.7m vs UBSe $129.8m (Cons. $127.2m); (4) Underlying EPS 33.8cps vs UBSe 36.1cps (Cons. 35.0cps); (5) Final DPS 14.0cps ...

Investment Rating - The report assigns a "Buy" rating for Challenger Financial Services Group with a 12-month price target of A$8.00, indicating a potential upside from the current price of A$6.88 [2][9]. Core Insights - Earnings and dividends exceeded expectations due to improved core margins and reduced costs, leading to a positive market reaction despite some concerns regarding capital position [6]. - Normalised NPBT increased by 17% to A$608 million, surpassing both UBS estimates and consensus [3]. - The Life EBIT rose by 17% to A$634 million, also above consensus expectations, reflecting strong operational performance [4]. Financial Performance - Normalised NPAT was reported at A$417 million, aligning with UBS estimates and consensus [3]. - Final dividend per share (DPS) was set at 13.5 cents, slightly above UBS and consensus estimates [3]. - Life annuity sales decreased by 6% to A$5.19 billion, which was above UBS estimates [4]. Guidance and Projections - For FY25, the guidance for normalised NPBT is set between A$640 million and A$700 million, with consensus at A$669 million [5]. - The effective tax rate is projected at 31.3%, with a cost-to-income ratio expected to improve to 32-34% [5]. - The report anticipates a normalised pre-tax ROE target of RBA cash rate +12%, currently at 11.2% post-tax [5]. Market Position and Valuation - Challenger is recognized as the dominant annuity provider in the Australian market, with a diversified financial services portfolio [12]. - The report highlights a strong balance sheet with a PCA ratio of 1.67x, indicating improved capital adequacy [4][6]. - Forecasts suggest a price appreciation of 16.3% and a dividend yield of 4.0%, leading to an overall forecast stock return of 20.3% [11].

First Read Temple & Webster Group UBS SnapShot: FY24 Results ONE LINER: EBITDA beat, sales inline, trading update +26% y/y OUTLOOK AND GUIDANCE: FY25 commenced strongly with revenue first 6wks up 26% year on year. FY25 will continue to include an additional 2-3% of revenue invested into brand marketing across brand and performance channels. FY25 EBITDA mgn inc marketing investment 1-3%. EBITDA margins to incrementally build from FY26 towards LT BAU EBITDA margin of +15%. Current $30m on-market buyback will ...

ab 13 August 2024 Global Research and Evidence Lab First Read Seek UBS SnapShot: 2H24 Result ONE LINER Top line delivered in 2H but higher D&A and interest drag on NPAT. FY25e outlook suggests yield stronger, and assuming worse than expected ANZ vols 2H24 KEY NUMBERS Rev $563m (UBSe $563m, VA cons $537m); EBITDA $230m (UBSe $235m, cons. $238m); Adjusted NPAT $64m (UBSe $74m, cons. $80m); Capex -$73m (UBSe $-88m, cons -$89m); Div 16cps (UBSe 15cps, cons. 16cps) 2H24 RESULT HIGHLIGHTS 1. ANZ Rev -7% y/y to $4 ...