李嘉诚最后一点名声,卖了190亿
36氪·2025-03-26 00:07

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent sale of 43 global ports by Li Ka-shing's CK Hutchison Holdings to a consortium led by BlackRock for $22.8 billion, highlighting the mixed reactions from the public and media in Hong Kong regarding national interests and Li's business ethics [6][8][10]. Group 1: Sale of Ports - CK Hutchison Holdings announced the sale of 43 global ports for $22.8 billion, resulting in approximately $19 billion cash income for Li Ka-shing's family after minority shareholder adjustments [6][8]. - The sale includes ports in 23 countries, with significant locations such as the Panama Canal, where Chinese cargo accounts for 21.4% of total traffic [19][22]. - Following the announcement, CK Hutchison's stock price initially rose by 33% but faced a decline after public backlash and media criticism [8][12]. Group 2: Public Reaction - Hong Kong media criticized the sale, questioning the decision to transfer control to a foreign entity and its implications for national interests [10][14]. - Some commentators accused Li Ka-shing of lacking integrity and being overly accommodating to foreign powers, leading to a significant drop in public sentiment towards him [10][14][36]. - The article notes that Li's reputation has suffered, with comparisons drawn to other Hong Kong tycoons who have maintained a stronger commitment to local investments [62][70]. Group 3: Historical Context - The article traces Li Ka-shing's history with the Panama Canal, where he secured management rights in 1997, and his long-term investments in the region that have yielded substantial returns [24][30]. - It highlights that Li's business strategies have evolved over the years, with a notable shift towards overseas investments, particularly in the UK, which has raised concerns about his commitment to Hong Kong [48][56]. - The article contrasts Li's approach with that of other successful Hong Kong businessmen who have continued to invest in mainland China, suggesting a divergence in business philosophy [62][70].