Google 决定终止开源 Android，有什么影响？

Core Viewpoint - Google has decided to stop maintaining the public branch of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP), leading to a more closed development process that may eventually eliminate the open-source aspect of AOSP altogether [1][12][13]. Group 1: What Happened? - Google will no longer maintain the public branch of AOSP, and all Android development will occur solely within Google's internal branch starting next week [1][12]. - Only Google employees will have access to the internal branch or be able to submit code, resulting in a lack of transparency in the Android development process [2][12]. Group 2: Impacts - Mainstream smartphone brands and their users, such as Xiaomi, vivo, OPPO, and Samsung, are not expected to be affected as they have existing agreements with Google to access the latest Android source code and Google Mobile Services (GMS) [3][14]. - Consumers of non-certified Android devices may face impacts, as Google may compel these manufacturers to sign agreements to access the latest code, potentially increasing costs for consumers [4][28]. - Some manufacturers may resist Google's demands, leading to a reduction in market options for consumers [5][28]. - Third-party ROM developers will experience significant challenges, as they may only be able to modify and maintain the last available version of AOSP until it becomes obsolete [6][29]. - Android application developers may not see immediate effects, but the existing fragmentation in the Android ecosystem could worsen, increasing costs for smaller developers [8][29]. Group 3: Future Considerations - The decision to close AOSP may be driven by Google's desire to reduce costs and increase revenue, as maintaining multiple code branches and collaborations is resource-intensive [13][32]. - Google aims to regain control over the non-certified device market, which could lead to higher prices for consumers and reduced choices [27][28]. - The closure of AOSP may also hinder innovation and competition among developers, particularly affecting smaller players in the market [29][32].