“双标”的美国产业政策：类型、动因、效果及思考

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contradictions and effects of the U.S. industrial policy, highlighting the dual standards in trade practices and the impact of domestic challenges on the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing [2]. Group 1: Types and Mechanisms of U.S. Industrial Policy - U.S. industrial policy can be categorized into domestic supportive policies and foreign restrictive policies, aimed at enhancing domestic industry competitiveness and limiting foreign competition [5]. - Domestic supportive policies include fiscal and financial measures, government procurement, and innovation support, while foreign restrictive policies encompass investment restrictions and trade protection measures [5][4]. Group 2: Fiscal and Financial Policies - The Inflation Reduction Act plans to invest $391 billion in energy and climate initiatives from 2022 to 2031, with $234 billion allocated for tax credits and $157 billion for subsidies and loans [6]. - The CHIPS Act authorizes approximately $52 billion in subsidies and loan guarantees for semiconductor manufacturing and related research [6]. - U.S. government spending on industrial subsidies has increased from $45.8 billion in 2000 to $128 billion in 2022, maintaining around $100 billion annually thereafter [6]. Group 3: Government Procurement and Market Access Policies - The U.S. government prioritizes domestic procurement, mandating that at least $200 billion of federal purchases annually be for products with over 50% domestic content [13]. - The U.S. has pressured other countries to lower trade barriers and increase procurement of American goods, exemplified by agreements with Japan and China [14][13]. Group 4: Innovation Support Policies - Innovation support policies include funding for research and development in clean energy and technology, with significant investments outlined in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act [16][18]. - The U.S. government has established various research centers to promote technological innovation, providing competitive funding to universities and companies [17]. Group 5: Infrastructure Investment Policies - The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocates nearly $100 billion for transportation infrastructure, while the Inflation Reduction Act invests approximately $30 billion in modernizing the electric grid [19][20]. - The Biden administration's broadband plan aims to invest $42.45 billion to enhance broadband access in underserved areas [19]. Group 6: Trade Protection Policies - The U.S. has implemented tariffs on imports based on national security and unfair trade practices, including a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum [24]. - The U.S. has historically pressured countries to agree to voluntary export restrictions, as seen in agreements with Japan in the 1980s [25]. Group 7: Technology Restriction Policies - The U.S. has placed several Chinese technology companies on an entity list, restricting their access to U.S. technology under the guise of national security [27]. - The CHIPS and Science Act prohibits semiconductor companies receiving U.S. subsidies from expanding operations in China for ten years [27]. Group 8: Implementation Motivations and Characteristics - The U.S. industrial policy aims to enhance competitiveness, ensure supply chain security, reduce income inequality, and maintain technological leadership [32][36]. - The federal government primarily drives these policies, with state and local governments playing a limited role [37]. Group 9: Effectiveness of U.S. Industrial Policies - Overall, U.S. industrial policies have seen varying degrees of success, particularly in innovation support, while trade protection measures have had limited effectiveness [39]. - Successful policies include innovation initiatives that have led to significant technological advancements and job creation [40][41].