18岁高中生开发APP年入上亿，发帖炫耀后遭名校集体拒收！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rejection of Zach Yadegari, an 18-year-old CEO and co-founder of an AI company, from 15 prestigious universities despite his impressive academic credentials and entrepreneurial success, sparking widespread debate about college admissions processes [1][6][12]. Group 1: Zach Yadegari's Background - Yadegari has a 4.0 GPA and a 34 ACT score, applying to 18 universities and being rejected by 15, including Ivy League schools and top institutions like Stanford and MIT [1][6]. - He developed a successful AI calorie tracking app, Cal AI, which has generated millions in revenue and is projected to reach an annual recurring revenue of $30 million [4][12]. - At 16, he sold a web game company for $100,000 and has been programming since age 7, showcasing a strong entrepreneurial spirit [5][12]. Group 2: College Admissions Reaction - His rejection led to significant online engagement, with over 27 million views and numerous comments expressing dissatisfaction with the admissions process [2][12]. - Some speculate that the content of his college essay may have influenced the admissions decisions, with opinions divided on its tone and implications [8][13]. Group 3: College Essay Insights - Yadegari's essay revealed his initial reluctance to attend college, stating he believed he would never go, but later recognized the value of the college experience [10][11]. - He expressed a desire for personal growth and social connections rather than just specific skills, indicating a shift in his perspective on higher education [12][14]. - The essay's perceived arrogance led some to believe it contributed to his rejections, with discussions around the implications of his entrepreneurial success on his college prospects [13][14]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The article highlights a growing concern about the college admissions process, particularly regarding the treatment of high-achieving applicants, as seen in the case of another student, Stanley Zhong, who faced similar rejections despite outstanding qualifications [14][15]. - The discussion reflects a broader critique of how universities assess applicants, particularly those with entrepreneurial backgrounds, and the potential biases in the admissions process [14][15].