Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling, explained

Legal Analysis - The Supreme Court's decision does not address the merits of birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, but restricts the power of lower courts [1] - Justice Jackson argues the decision creates two zones in America: one where court orders are followed, and a "zone of lawlessness" [1] - This "zone of lawlessness" disproportionately impacts the poor, uneducated, and unpopular, who may lack the resources to seek legal recourse [1] - The rule of law depends on equal treatment for everyone, regardless of status [2] Potential Societal Impact - The decision could lead to uneven application of the law, affecting those without the means to challenge executive actions [1] - Uneven application of the law undermines the foundation of society, which relies on equal treatment for all [1][2]