‘They need to cheat to win’: Legal Defense Fund head on GOP push to redraw maps

Election Integrity Concerns - The federal government's request for state voter rolls and voting machine access is viewed as an overreach of authority, infringing on state responsibilities [1][3] - Concerns exist that the intention behind federal involvement is to manipulate election outcomes, potentially leading to rigged elections [9][11][13] - There are worries about voter purges based on baseless allegations, particularly in states like North Carolina [7] Legal and Legislative Framework - States should resist federal overreach, citing the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) as the governing law for election administration [4] - Existing federal legislation must be meticulously followed by both the federal government and the states to ensure fair elections [5] Voter Rights and Advocacy - Voters need to actively defend free and fair elections, opposing fraudulent or unfair power balances in Congress [6] - Organizations are prepared to defend voting rights and advocate for voters, emphasizing the need for states to protect their voters as well [5] - The focus should be on ensuring voters have unfettered access to the ballot and fair representation, reflecting the will of the majority [11] Political Implications - The current administration's actions are seen as an attempt to cheat in order to win, as they cannot win based on the majority of voters' will [11] - Rigged elections and interference in election processes could lead to laws and actions that do not represent the interests of American voters [12][13]