'Nobody wants to live in a military state': Illinois AG speaks out on Trump's threats

Legal & Constitutional Concerns - The Attorney General argues the President's deployment of the National Guard lacks constitutional basis, as prerequisites like foreign invasion or insurrection are absent [2] - The Attorney General emphasizes the importance of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws, rather than presidential decree [2] Law Enforcement & Federalism - The Attorney General highlights that crime control is primarily a state and local responsibility [2] - The Attorney General suggests that federal assistance should focus on supporting existing law enforcement agencies like the FBI, DEA, and ATF [3] - The Attorney General expresses concern that deploying troops against citizens could create a sense of a military or fascist state [5] Public Safety & Community Impact - The Attorney General suggests deploying troops could have a similar negative effect as seen in DC, where some residents, particularly immigrants, feel less safe [4] - The Attorney General notes that residents in DC, especially the immigrant population, feel less safe due to federal intervention, with some employees being too afraid to go to work [4] - The Attorney General argues that using the military against citizens is inappropriate, as police forces are meant to maintain public safety [5]