Judge rules Trump illegally deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles

Political & Legal Disputes - The report highlights a dispute between President Trump and officials in Illinois and Chicago regarding the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago to address crime [2][3][4] - Illinois Governor JB Pritsker opposes federal intervention, calling Trump "unhinged" and stating that troops are neither needed nor wanted [2][3] - Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson criticizes Trump's focus on troop deployment instead of addressing illegal gun trafficking into the city [4][5] - A federal judge ruled that President Trump violated federal law by deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles earlier in the year, which could influence the situation in Chicago [8][9] - The legal analysis suggests that the ruling in California does not legally prevent the Trump administration from deploying troops in Chicago unless the Supreme Court rules otherwise [11][12] - Legal experts suggest Illinois could initiate a similar lawsuit to the one in California to limit Trump's ability to send troops [14][15] Gun Violence & Federal Response - Chicago officials emphasize the need for federal action to stop the flow of guns into the city from other states, particularly "red states" like Indiana, Mississippi, and Louisiana [5] - The report suggests that occupying Chicago with troops will not solve the problem of gun violence [6] - The report indicates that top officials in Illinois and Chicago are open to federal assistance focused on gun violence prevention [7] Immigration & Deportation - A federal appeals court ruled against President Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to rapidly deport Venezuelan migrants suspected of being gang members [16][17][18] - The ruling prevents the use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged members of a specific gang from Texas to Venezuela, but other legal authorities and immigration statutes may still be available [19]