Expert warns scaling back quarterly reports could spark volatility and unfair edge

Market Transparency & Volatility - Proposal to reduce reporting frequency to semi-annually is viewed negatively, potentially increasing volatility due to larger information gaps [2][4][17][18] - Less frequent reports could lead to bigger surprises and market reactions, described as a "tape bomb" effect [2][17] - Reduced transparency may disadvantage retail investors and advantage insiders with access to non-public information, potentially promoting insider trading [3][23] Investor Sentiment & Preferences - Most investors are not seeking less frequent earnings reports, with institutional investors like pension funds likely to oppose the proposal due to their need for transparency [6] - Investors rely on quarterly reports and company forecasts for timely and material information, making less frequent reporting detrimental [10] - Some companies in Europe voluntarily report quarterly despite not being required, driven by investor demand and the desire to avoid large price swings [16] Reporting Frequency & Calendar Alignment - There is a preference for maintaining quarterly reports, with opinions varying on whether monthly reports would be beneficial [12][13] - A shift away from the current calendar-aligned fiscal year reporting is not widely desired by investors [22] - Maintaining the current calendar fiscal year is preferred for ease of alignment and digestion of information [20]